1994-03-07 - Re: spooks

Header Data

From: jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu (Jim Wilson (VA))
To: fhalper@pilot.njin.net (Frederic Halper)
Message Hash: 9ca2bef9a77a9e1cb3ff695c6fcb71e3389bb4d9bf6cfa7525bc3fcff6a67dac
Message ID: <9403070258.AA08019@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
Reply To: <9403031629.AA09423@pilot.njin.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-07 02:58:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 18:58:38 PST

Raw message

From: jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu (Jim Wilson (VA))
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 18:58:38 PST
To: fhalper@pilot.njin.net (Frederic Halper)
Subject: Re: spooks
In-Reply-To: <9403031629.AA09423@pilot.njin.net>
Message-ID: <9403070258.AA08019@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> If there are any spooks on this list aren't they required by law to say that 
> they are if somoeon asked if anyone on on th list was employed by CIA, DOD, FBI
> or NSA?
> Reuben Halper
> 
If undercover police can tell you that they are not a cop and then arrest you
without your being able to claim entrapment, why should the three letter
agency agents be compelled to do so by law?  (Not an arguement in favor of this
but a question as to what law would require this.)

-Jim






Thread