1994-03-29 - Re: cfp ‘94 transcript

Header Data

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
To: werner@mc.ab.com
Message Hash: bc21e7f25a3424570be32d1c415a8bac16f508ee9784cd05b10202f77acb820c
Message ID: <199403291540.KAA08667@eff.org>
Reply To: <9403291452.AA05320@werner.mc.ab.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-29 15:40:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Mar 94 07:40:57 PST

Raw message

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 94 07:40:57 PST
To: werner@mc.ab.com
Subject: Re: cfp '94 transcript
In-Reply-To: <9403291452.AA05320@werner.mc.ab.com>
Message-ID: <199403291540.KAA08667@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 
> >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 1994 05:52:22 -0800
> >From: Jack King <gjk@well.sf.ca.us>
> >
> >In Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, it is now a federal crime to state
> >orally or in writing to any federal administrative or law enforcement
> >officer, during the course of an official investigation that you don't know
> >what they are talking about if in fact you do. 
> 
> How can something be a federal crime in only 3 states?
 
18 USC 1001 is a crime in every state, but interpretations of the law
may vary by circuit. We're talking about the Fifth Circuit here, looks
like.


--Mike







Thread