1994-03-06 - Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently

Header Data

From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Message Hash: da7641c04cf4a18731ac220fdf32c44052ee875bd0b661d0ba8f4cb4d5eef6f4
Message ID: <199403062000.UAA17352@an-teallach.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-06 20:00:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 12:00:49 PST

Raw message

From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 12:00:49 PST
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Subject: Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently
Message-ID: <199403062000.UAA17352@an-teallach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	> Perry, I *already* have the bsd4.4 Kerberized telnet with DES that comes with
	> the BSDI distribution (original code in the US, a re-implementation on
	> supplementary floppies in the UK)

	Not the same program at all. Why don't you actually read some of the
	RFCs instead of making yourself look foolish?

Well if you have nothing useful to contribute but won't shut up anyway,
I will.  This conversation is over.

	> Not *one* of the dozen odd sites I telnet to is running it.

	Have you asked them to run it? Have you considered simply running the
	daemon yourself on another port instead of implementing some crude
	hack?

I already do this.

Goodbye.

::
^From.*metzger
|/dev/null

G





Thread