1994-04-27 - Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP

Header Data

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Message Hash: 0effce27faea891fa8225ec65b24bd2784c43b2bac678072206f013cc89d65fb
Message ID: <199404272045.NAA23049@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9404272018.AA19034@vail.tivoli.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-27 20:45:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Apr 94 13:45:36 PDT

Raw message

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 94 13:45:36 PDT
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Subject: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
In-Reply-To: <9404272018.AA19034@vail.tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <199404272045.NAA23049@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> 
> Sameer writes:
>  > 	Well starting sometime this summer I'm going to start selling
>  > shell accounts, and I don't plan on spending much time verifying
>  > that there is a TrueName associated with any given account.
> 
> Most (all?) private PO box places won't give out a box without a
> "real" US mail address and some form of ID.  Is this due to legal
> requirements (direct or indirect)?  If so, can we not look forward to
> such restrictions being placed on those who supply electronic PO
> boxes?
> 
> --
> | GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>       |
> | TAKE TWA TO CAIRO.          ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX:        |
> |     (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |
> 





Thread