1994-04-02 - Re: Left, Right, Up, Down–Libertarian Ideas

Header Data

From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 10b0d100c70cf6c3d2d5d673fb5a9e787fc10dec77ac7d24362f871a08ecd1f6
Message ID: <199404020502.AA17875@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-02 05:03:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Apr 94 21:03:29 PST

Raw message

From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 94 21:03:29 PST
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Left, Right, Up, Down--Libertarian Ideas
Message-ID: <199404020502.AA17875@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim May writes:

>Check out the "Nolan Chart," which is a fairly common classification
>in _two_ dimensions. Libertarians often use it to recruit members, by
>showing that the views of people they ask ("Do you favor legalizing
>drugs?" etc.) are often more similar to the libertarian position than
>to others.
>
>In fairness to my left-leaning friends (Dave Mandl as a good example),
>the questions in the Nolan Chart test are designed to make almost
>anyone appear to be a libertarian.

Yeah, I agree.  It always seemed like a tremendous kludge to me.

But anyway...In case my point was misunderstood, I should clarify.  I was
not trying to enforce conservative/liberal distinctions, which (like most
people on this list) I think are fairly meaningless.  The world is much
more complicated than that; though there are minor real differences,
supposed distinctions between "conservatives" and "liberals" are for the
most part an illusion--part of the "spectacle," to use Situationist jargon.
I responded the way I did to John Kreznar's post precisely because it
looked identical to standard Republican-style leftist-baiting, which I
unfortunately see too much of every day on the net.  John cleared this up
in personal email.  Apologies if I misunderstood or misconstrued what he
was saying.

   --Dave.

--
Dave Mandl
dmandl@panix.com







Thread