1994-04-13 - alias in phone book

Header Data

From: “Gary Jeffers” <CCGARY@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 113645330cef971ab2a871cc52c259e296f71b17fe605a5f96e044066d42618f
Message ID: <9404132207.AA15183@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-13 22:07:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Apr 94 15:07:22 PDT

Raw message

From: "Gary Jeffers" <CCGARY@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 94 15:07:22 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: alias in phone book
Message-ID: <9404132207.AA15183@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


* Gun control is people control. - Gary Jeffers

   Why hasn't anyone discussed the utility of phony names in the
phone books for fooling state investigators? If you have an unlisted
phone number & a state snoop asks for your listing, the phone company
will also check the unlisted numbers. What would happen if you had
a phony name that the phone company agreed to use. Would the snoops
be thrown for a loss? Could phony names be even better than unlisted?
The phone company would probably demand your real name for billing
purposes.
                                             Yours Truly,
                                             Gary Jeffers
                           PUSH EM BACK! PUSH EM BACK!
                           WWWAAAYYY   BBBAAACCCKKKK!
                           BBBEEEAAATTTT  STATE!





Thread