1994-04-27 - Re: Gee…

Header Data

From: juola@bruno.cs.colorado.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3cab72a38e8c74c45086b3595c4538f2b8440b17e6c5395ee15c537e56e09e89
Message ID: <199404271735.LAA10571@bruno.cs.colorado.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-27 17:36:05 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Apr 94 10:36:05 PDT

Raw message

From: juola@bruno.cs.colorado.edu
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 94 10:36:05 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Gee...
Message-ID: <199404271735.LAA10571@bruno.cs.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  >Gee, how about getting arrested for exporting munitions?
  
  That'll happen with the book'o'barcodes too, and you can't
  use an anonymous remailer for that.

I believe that's the question under discussion -- whether or not
a book'o'barcodes would pass under the ITAR regulations.  Given
that the book itself passes (has already passed), what changes
would need to be made so that the book could still be exported but
be much easier to enter into a machine than having to retype the
whole thing.

	Patrick





Thread