1994-04-17 - Re: Idea for a Minor New Remailer Feature: Dead Drop Aliases

Header Data

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: bf6c1c9a60652db19e4a62040f7bf35ad01a7578557248dabc3d392f7d4191f8
Message ID: <9404170844.AA13739@toad.com>
Reply To: <199404170540.WAA04579@netcom12.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-17 08:44:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Apr 94 01:44:46 PDT

Raw message

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 94 01:44:46 PDT
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Idea for a Minor New Remailer Feature: Dead Drop Aliases
In-Reply-To: <199404170540.WAA04579@netcom12.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9404170844.AA13739@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Not to volunteer anybody's copious spare time, but I have a hunch a
> Perl program could implement this automatic reflector easily.

It's a one-liner in the .forward or .maildelivery file you edit to
set up a remailer.  Almost anybody could act as a "bounce point" in
this fashion.  I don't think it would do much for joe@uptight.org,
though.  root@uptight is more likely to notice the traffic than to
happen across joe advertising his remailer in alt.random.group.

> (I don't see any commands in elm,
> my mailer, that can do selective bouncing/forwarding...

Try "man forward".  (Or "man maildelivery" in my case, but probably
not netcom's.)  This sort of handling happens before the MUA sees
the mail.

   Eli   ebrandt@hmc.edu






Thread