1994-04-03 - Re: Positive uses for PGP

Header Data

From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Message Hash: c90a3c73c25eb42236f142a1408afcdca6f92c077bbfc784e3a45f2ac4e27a5c
Message ID: <9404031447.AA03588@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <9404031439.AA03546@vail.tivoli.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-03 14:48:05 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 07:48:05 PDT

Raw message

From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 07:48:05 PDT
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Subject: Re: Positive uses for PGP
In-Reply-To: <9404031439.AA03546@vail.tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <9404031447.AA03588@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> ... nor do I wish to imply that the above offer is attractive...

Oops.  First e-mail of the day.  Make that "isn't attractive".  Which
is not to say that it isn't attractive, because it is; "attractive"
should be the target of the negating negatives "nor" and "isn't".

Thread

• Return to April 1994

• Return to “jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)”
• Return to “m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)”
• Return to “mech@eff.org (Stanton McCandlish)”
• Return to “Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>”

• Return to ““Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>”

• 1994-04-03 (Sun, 3 Apr 94 00:09:53 PST) - Positive uses for PGP - Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
  • 1994-04-03 (Sun, 3 Apr 94 07:39:24 PDT) - Re: Positive uses for PGP - m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1994-04-03 (Sun, 3 Apr 94 07:48:05 PDT) - Re: Positive uses for PGP - m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1994-04-03 (Sun, 3 Apr 94 09:15:30 PDT) - Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP) - “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
      • 1994-04-03 (Sun, 3 Apr 94 15:27:34 PDT) - Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP) - jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
    • 1994-04-05 (Tue, 5 Apr 94 09:18:33 PDT) - Re: Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP) - mech@eff.org (Stanton McCandlish)