1994-04-14 - Re: New anon mailer idea?

Header Data

From: Anonymous <mg5n+ea2uj7war2ufizqiqrdidkaii9mfkcwjze6q910g3a6@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: c-punks <mg5n+anz3ajg8o1yxicqzt6v6qgpg3tkhddpqw3jl@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message Hash: e03d69ccae4935dfcd50ae20c35e3086b8eacceae69012295fca5ce358cf7b39
Message ID: <Added.ohfPM9m00UdaBIBU5r@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-14 21:31:06 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Apr 94 14:31:06 PDT

Raw message

From: Anonymous <mg5n+ea2uj7war2ufizqiqrdidkaii9mfkcwjze6q910g3a6@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 94 14:31:06 PDT
To: c-punks <mg5n+anz3ajg8o1yxicqzt6v6qgpg3tkhddpqw3jl@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: New anon mailer idea?
Message-ID: <Added.ohfPM9m00UdaBIBU5r@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Graham Toal's suggestion for automatic insertion of an encrypted
> return address block is interesting.  We had some discussion here
> last year of a similar approach, although Graham's twist of using
> a symmetric rather than PK cypher for the return address is new.
[...]

This is new?  I thought Matt Ghio's remailer at andrew.cmu.edu did this
already!?!?






Thread