1994-04-21 - telco

Header Data

From: anonymous@extropia.wimsey.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e71a5ce8d91c27d5c7f041430441ce646198ed5858594760538206cca54e843c
Message ID: <199404211338.AA03007@xtropia>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-21 13:53:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Apr 94 06:53:09 PDT

Raw message

From: anonymous@extropia.wimsey.com
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 94 06:53:09 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: telco
Message-ID: <199404211338.AA03007@xtropia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> I received annoying phone calls for a period of time, and the local phone
> company (US West) said they'd only get involved once I had an "incident
> number" (or some such) from the police department, and that information
> gathered would only be released to the police. I suppose if I actually
> filed a civil suit against the harassing party (even as a John Doe?) I
> could then use the discovery process to compel them to release their
> relevant records - but that's not really the scenario that Brad and
> 'kitten' seem to imagine.

In the days when telcos used the SXS switching system, there was
significant cost in tracing a call - each channel had to be physically
seized and held - but now it's just a matter of pulling a tape or
punching up the info on a console.  Nevertheless, there are legal
obligations of confidentiality.  Interestingly, the police generally
have no problem seizing toll information on a subscriber, once the
warrant is obtained, because the subscriber needn't be informed - only
the telco, which has a vested interest in keeping the subscriber unaware
that his considentiality was violated.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCdAgUBLbVtMRL41rmHzZFFAQGAYwQ7BD+WytKPhNAXXhWRAFeYlSz+TJzGP58T
YB56S+ktajebyJEc4GH0n8beevGSjv9Q6JGWkxifLITKy05eL9RXs8bC5ScTjJQL
JhDB1DTPAVp5Y5NNGIX1bpMPLdBe2KiRnOzlL/jcUkUFu4dUQ1fPXQ9NC3JFrqC0
ZLeuEcJRKM2hIlYZ0KraUg==
=VaUh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread