1994-05-11 - Re: State Dept Response to my second CJ request

Header Data

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
To: perry@imsi.com
Message Hash: 76b3d2dd514ce30a016870d387774ba3241a73a63bf29c8b1d3ae91e2834f9df
Message ID: <199405112131.OAA18089@servo.qualcomm.com>
Reply To: <9405112031.AA13596@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-11 21:32:44 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 May 94 14:32:44 PDT

Raw message

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 94 14:32:44 PDT
To: perry@imsi.com
Subject: Re: State Dept Response to my second CJ request
In-Reply-To: <9405112031.AA13596@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <199405112131.OAA18089@servo.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>I think the question is premature, but the intention isn't. We ought
>to give Phil a few days to figure out what his future strategy is.

What you said. Thanks for all the expressions of support.

At this point the best thing to do is to talk to all the lawyers who
know this stuff to decide what to do next. What may seem cut-and-dried
to us laymen usually isn't to a lawyer.

If you really want to contribute and can't wait, EFF already has a
cryptography defense fund. I've given to it myself, and suggest that
others do too.

Phil





Thread