1994-05-11 - Re: MIT TOC SEMINAR–ADI SHAMIR–MONDAY–MAY 16–4:15pm

Header Data

From: Nathan Loofbourrow <loofbour@cis.ohio-state.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a18b3ec2a13568ca32577f785dde2fc339e927e1c801586f6d43b8e210e87b70
Message ID: <199405111933.PAA07198@styracosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Reply To: <199405111707.KAA16650@netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-11 19:33:39 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 May 94 12:33:39 PDT

Raw message

From: Nathan Loofbourrow <loofbour@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 May 94 12:33:39 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: MIT TOC SEMINAR--ADI SHAMIR--MONDAY--MAY 16--4:15pm
In-Reply-To: <199405111707.KAA16650@netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199405111933.PAA07198@styracosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Paul E. Baclace writes:
 > I'm very curious as to how humans can directly decode encrypted
 > pictures.  Do they stare at it for 10 minutes and go "ah, there
 > it is". 

SIRD stereograms might qualify as an encryption method, although many
have been able to view these patterns using a brute-force search by
selectively diverging the eyes.

I don't see how this generalizes to a k of d secret sharing analogue,
unless the viewer is assumed to have k+1 eyes.

nathan





Thread