1994-05-12 - Re: Message Havens

Header Data

From: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cad97f89d84523440d79e8135bd7adceaeac5ff91b129ff4435c2d42dc5c0e21
Message ID: <9405120451.AA27627@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-12 04:51:52 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 May 94 21:51:52 PDT

Raw message

From: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 May 94 21:51:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Message Havens
Message-ID: <9405120451.AA27627@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> People could use anonymous remailers to send in messages, and use
> pseudonyms to protect their privacy.

It occured to me that perhaps getting messages to a message haven
won't require anonymous mail to protect privacy (who you are
communicating with.  You would still need to use a remailer to hide
the fact you are using the message haven!).

In each message, the author could specify what to name the next reply.
If messages are encrypted, then all a watcher would see is incoming
messages from various people, but not be able to figure out who is
reading what message, and what messages are responses to what other
messages.

This would require the service to reject unencrypted messages, which
would be easy enough.  But it would still require people to "download"
everything and sift through it at home, to hide what messages they are
interested in.

Karl Barrus
klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLdG1c4OA7OpLWtYzAQH2MQP/f5M/4QHHHl8qg85ikGCkmFiN6wrs+DHc
3iIpogSO5oj/tJZ0xnHzky8B3Ll2rjmHgW+vH5hxTONw+2TZ5+5aFjJbqCs1pL1a
rYFFyUP6AOj3809G1gSuLwa85iw5jY5fT/JZsMH82uL2v5i2839jQDZo1SCHff/1
77gQgjP9Agk=
=7p6A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread