1994-05-13 - Re: List moderation

Header Data

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: dave@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov (Dave Otto)
Message Hash: d8ff9a5e0e0514c6457115d6148239f4d797a67710fbb189bf8f916b89687d79
Message ID: <199405131833.LAA00917@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9405131830.AA17725@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-13 18:35:36 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 May 94 11:35:36 PDT

Raw message

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 May 94 11:35:36 PDT
To: dave@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov (Dave Otto)
Subject: Re: List moderation
In-Reply-To: <9405131830.AA17725@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
Message-ID: <199405131833.LAA00917@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> 
> I oppose moderation.  1) It is a form of censorship.  2) It (inevitably)
> introduces bias.  3) If you don't like *them* (net.loon, etc.), create a
> kill file.

	Like I said I already filter the list and generally only read
the people that I know will make a post that worth my time to read. I
don't propose that an moderated list is set up, but I suspect that I
will probably make available a filtered (by message, not by
author.. by author would be too easy) version of the list available if
I find it profitable.
	If I suck at the job, then no one will use my filter and it
will be moot. (And I'll search for other ways to make my net-service
Better Than the Rest[tm])

-Sameer






Thread