1994-05-07 - Re: legal rqmt for FAX return phone

Header Data

From: harveyrj@vt.edu (R. J. Harvey)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d959f9a30e9f1d2468320bb6404ce0efdc014ad066cd7f24509afb78046020bc
Message ID: <9405070103.AA17833@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-07 01:03:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 May 94 18:03:57 PDT

Raw message

From: harveyrj@vt.edu (R. J. Harvey)
Date: Fri, 6 May 94 18:03:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: legal rqmt for FAX return phone #
Message-ID: <9405070103.AA17833@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

hi: 
>
>I thought I heard somewhere that it was illegal to send
>anonymous faxes -- namely, that there was some regulation
>that you had to program your FAX machine with your phone
>number so it would get sent automagically whenever you
>faxed anything. Essentially it was ILLEGAL to fax without
>providing the recipient with a mechanism to find out where
>it came from. Of course, I suspect enforcement is lax, but
>still...  :-)  :-(
>
>Can someone please confirm this, or help with a reference?
>Private e-mail is fine...
>
   according to the manual I received with my copy of 
WinFax Lite (p. 2-10), "recently passed US legislation"
requires date, time, ID of entity, and tel # of sender.
unfortunately, it doesn't say WHAT that legislation 
might be!  the copyright on the manual is June 1993.

rj

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLcqqITaPaZsSlprpAQEQ/AQArQ30Lf44sWmUPvBtM4SYznTl9cE6nevQ
ZZWaBPGgJDwz6lYJo+82VsTatXa7IRyOBjp8BVaNuOIKl4/FA7MzmztwluMrfJvZ
sdwdNYfpLr3nVnVKbGqQUWT7jmt6+472iUASo4oAQGfPz1ekipi+QpTJ/fJoTEjj
SRtEUYLBrwQ=
=DZhw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. J. Harvey                   (harveyrj.beva.blacksburg.va.us) 
email:  harveyrj@vt.edu
PGP fingerprint F9 67 AD DC C3 D5 48 DE C4 1E B5 DF 24 50 11 95






Thread