1994-06-14 - Re: How irritating are anon encrypted pgp messages

Header Data

From: Joseph Block <jpb@gate.net>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 207b6404bbac67b2792dd7ec5486489a847bc32f7703ddf6b4792ce2007938be
Message ID: <199406141223.IAA37169@inca.gate.net>
Reply To: <199406140315.UAA01032@netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-14 12:23:24 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Jun 94 05:23:24 PDT

Raw message

From: Joseph Block <jpb@gate.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 94 05:23:24 PDT
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: How irritating are anon encrypted pgp messages
In-Reply-To: <199406140315.UAA01032@netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199406141223.IAA37169@inca.gate.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Tim writes:
> I wrote:
> > Personally, I don't like them.  I can see that there are times when someone
> > would not want anyone to know what the recipient's email address is, but it is
> > just more noise to filter for everyone else.  I'm on several other mailing
> 
> The situation here is that _sender_ does not know the e-mail address
> of the recipient!
> 
> Whether these messages are a good thing or not is a different issue,
> but the fact is that what are seeing here is the use of the
> Cypherpunks mailing list as a "message pool."

If there is demand for this, someone should set up a message pool list, not
use cypherpunks.  If there was a pool list, I'm sure it would get traffic.




Thread