1994-06-23 - Re: Unofficial Release

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: trollins@telos.com (Tom Rollins)
Message Hash: 610e57d9980d9214cac6e59a647b4c327fa3e93b781620330b59c50a8335f35c
Message ID: <9406231157.AA04404@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <9406222103.AA09370@debbie.telos.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-23 11:58:13 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 Jun 94 04:58:13 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 94 04:58:13 PDT
To: trollins@telos.com (Tom Rollins)
Subject: Re: Unofficial Release
In-Reply-To: <9406222103.AA09370@debbie.telos.com>
Message-ID: <9406231157.AA04404@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tom Rollins says:
> Parry says:
> >Because it isn't cheap, first of all. If you wanted to run a
> >completely secure internet, for example (a problem I am currently
> >working on) the cost of all those RSAs really DOES show up, and fast.
> 
> Parry, It looks like you have your own agenda in which large rsa keys
> doesn't fit your time constraints.
> Don't implement large keys for your secure net.
> And don't convince yourself that it be COMPLETELY SECURE.

It will be no less secure than one using larger keys. This point is
lost on you, of course.

Perry





Thread