1994-06-02 - Re: News Flash: Clipper Bug?

Header Data

From: SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Message Hash: a8d59cc8d2ff9bd9eebf3959b3e8254ee97861b89192c12e4b9fe0b06c77aa2f
Message ID: <94Jun2.135210edt.13307@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
Reply To: <199406021704.SAA25398@an-teallach.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-02 17:52:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 10:52:25 PDT

Raw message

From: SINCLAIR  DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 10:52:25 PDT
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: News Flash: Clipper Bug?
In-Reply-To: <199406021704.SAA25398@an-teallach.com>
Message-ID: <94Jun2.135210edt.13307@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> One thing this shows, even if the application of the technique turns out
> to be too difficult to be practical, is that Dorothy Denning's evaluation
> of the design was worthless.  That team should have found this themselves.
> No wonder she was trying to play it down in the NYT.

It was my understanding that Denning was just looking at the Skipjack
algorithm, and not the clipper unit as a whole.  I wouldn't be too quick
to condemn her on this point.





Thread