1994-06-22 - Re: Unofficial Release

Header Data

From: Roger Bryner <bryner@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
Message Hash: e73d9633f988adee64af1c336e0cabf04e728951eb20c1378522fc0ff1db8539
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9406221309.A20389-0100000@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
Reply To: <9406221816.AA03231@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-22 19:12:44 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Jun 94 12:12:44 PDT

Raw message

From: Roger Bryner <bryner@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 94 12:12:44 PDT
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Subject: Re: Unofficial Release
In-Reply-To: <9406221816.AA03231@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9406221309.A20389-0100000@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 22 Jun 1994, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> And you know, who knows? Maybe they are in fact concealing more
> computers than you could build with all the silicon in the solar
> system in Fort Meade. Those feds, they are superhuman, you know?
There are two curves you have to worry about, one is computation, the 
other is advances in mathmatics.  Even if some great advance was made in 
factoring, a larger key *might* remain safe.  This is the reason, not 
increased computational power.  That is, unless you have proven some 
verry interesting things about factoring numbers and algorithmic complexity.

Roger, Mad Dog, Bryner.






Thread