1994-07-06 - Re: Windows for Workgroups 3.11

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: psee@sam.nask.com.pl (Andrzej Bursztynski)
Message Hash: 2b07497a9f4eec99167fccdbef860917510864fc2a24836309fd75d4b901670c
Message ID: <9407061119.AA13346@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <pge6kqGO$m5J068yn@sam.nask.com.pl>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-06 11:20:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 04:20:34 PDT

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 04:20:34 PDT
To: psee@sam.nask.com.pl (Andrzej Bursztynski)
Subject: Re: Windows for Workgroups 3.11
In-Reply-To: <pge6kqGO$m5J068yn@sam.nask.com.pl>
Message-ID: <9407061119.AA13346@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Just wonder if anyone had a closer look at the "Advanced security" option
> built in the Microsoft Windows for Workgroups 3.11. You can use a soft
> of a public/private key when sending a mail via fax (Class 1) driver
> Micrsoft Fax at Work. The key seems to be quite short and I wonder if that's
> a real secure solution comparing eg. to PGP?

If it really is public key, and if the keys really are quite short,
then its probably really *not* secure.  Remember than a 129-digit
(~425 bit) RSA key was broken in 8 months!  A 384-bit RSA key is
therefore not secure!

-derek






Thread