1994-07-07 - RE: “Cypherpunk” vs. “Cryptorebel”

Header Data

From: “Claborne, Chris at SanDiegoCA” <claborne@microcosm.sandiegoca.NCR.COM>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 3158e035d46cec9e42a0396735008b95b923dcf4b54f9753a600f380d7726ff0
Message ID: <2E1B5F85@microcosm.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-07 01:54:57 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 18:54:57 PDT

Raw message

From: "Claborne, Chris at SanDiegoCA" <claborne@microcosm.sandiegoca.NCR.COM>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 18:54:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: "Cypherpunk" vs. "Cryptorebel"
Message-ID: <2E1B5F85@microcosm.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Wed, 6 Jul 1994, Lefty wrote:

> >I like the label "cryptorebel" better than "cypherpunk".  The word
> >"punk" just does not seem right, while "rebel" does.   I do have a
> >certain attachment to "cypherpunk".  Comments?
>
> If it weren't for nitpickers, we'd all be knee-deep in nits.

   There is too much "name recognition" in "cypherpunk" for it to be dropped 
now...IMHO.

                                        ...  __o
                                       ..   -\<,
chris.claborne@sandiegoca.ncr.com      ...(*)/(*).          CI$: 76340.2422
PGP Pub Key fingerprint =  A8 FA 55 92 23 20 72 69  52 AB 64 CC C7 D9 4F CA
Avail on Pub Key server.





Thread