1994-07-19 - Encrypting fax machine

Header Data

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 43a94e58bca1b269f84fbe0feaf3f50763422a989668bcb15b42aaebe52d23df
Message ID: <9407190502.AA23131@ah.com>
Reply To: <aa5096b80302101e710e@[129.219.97.131]>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-19 05:26:26 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Jul 94 22:26:26 PDT

Raw message

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 94 22:26:26 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Encrypting fax machine
In-Reply-To: <aa5096b80302101e710e@[129.219.97.131]>
Message-ID: <9407190502.AA23131@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   At 6:07 AM 7/18/94, John Young wrote:
   >We use an encryption algorithm called seeded pseudo-random
   >number generator, Mr. Varga said.  The company chose that
   >algorithm because it is in the public domain, he added.

   One would think that anybody who would go to the expense of designing an
   encrypting FAX machine could at least afford to read the introduction to
   any beginning crypto book.

I just said this last week.  PNRG-XOR can be very secure.  If they're
using Blum-Blum-Shub, it could be secure, since there are other things
to go wrong.  If they're using a LFSR, it's not secure.

It looks like a none-too-competent technology reporter to me.

Eric





Thread