1994-07-28 - Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)

Header Data

From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
To: jamiel@sybase.com
Message Hash: 56b26a228edd01c79f741e8927a4996f67d80567370de438481aaca64b626910
Message ID: <m0qTbHD-000I8LC@crynwr.com>
Reply To: <9407281831.AB19187@ralph.sybgate.sybase.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-28 19:38:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 12:38:04 PDT

Raw message

From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 12:38:04 PDT
To: jamiel@sybase.com
Subject: Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)
In-Reply-To: <9407281831.AB19187@ralph.sybgate.sybase.com>
Message-ID: <m0qTbHD-000I8LC@crynwr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 11:37:38 -0800
   From: jamiel@sybase.com (Jamie Lawrence)

   Another thing that occured to me is the thought that if there were
   an organized web or remailers, remailers could bounce messages
   between them automatically-

Yes, that could be done.  Problem is that the NSA's remailer(s) would
immediately deliver messages to the destination.  Get enough NSA
remailers, and the web wouldn't be trustable.  Now, remailers in the
web can and should feel free to randomly forward mail to other
remailers, but it's the sender who should pick the minimum chain
length, and recursively encrypt their own envelopes.

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>    http://www.crynwr.com/crynwr/nelson.html
Crynwr Software   | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | ask4 PGP key
11 Grant St.      | +1 315 268 1925 (9201 FAX)  | What is thee doing about it?
Potsdam, NY 13676 | LPF member - ask me about the harm software patents do.





Thread