1994-07-19 - Re: Nat’l ID # ?

Header Data

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
To: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
Message Hash: 78b416af240e1d9c9ae7e6cbabaac4f3fcb8b5a3fbfa96ef948a43bdd58e0e88
Message ID: <9407191759.AA21824@fnord.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9407191526.AA20126@tis.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-19 18:00:42 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 11:00:42 PDT

Raw message

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 11:00:42 PDT
To: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
Subject: Re: Nat'l ID # ?
In-Reply-To: <9407191526.AA20126@tis.com>
Message-ID: <9407191759.AA21824@fnord.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 11:26:09 EDT
    From: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>

    It strikes me as anachronistic to worry about national ID numbers for
    privacy reasons.  With data processing of the 1950's

    . . .

    None of this requires a national ID card.

But, nothing prevents you from acting on an individual level to make
this the info gatherers job more difficult.  There is plenty of reason
to believe that effective strategies exist for keeping such data bases
inaccurate.

When such things have the force of law behind them, they are more
worrisome.  Making the info gatherers job more difficult is
potentially a harder task and even attempting to inject bogus data
could be criminally penalized.

			Rick





Thread