1994-07-27 - Latency vs. Reordering

Header Data

From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 868a8dd77110a9e46a96d44b7e0c72f62ee461fc0a28312641add733b1ea2cd9
Message ID: <940727141624e1Sjgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-27 19:21:20 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 12:21:20 PDT

Raw message

From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 12:21:20 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Latency vs. Reordering
Message-ID: <940727141624e1Sjgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes) writes:

> For the Nth time, it's not latency, it's reordering which is important.
     True. For small numbers of files re-ordering is important. On the
large scale, latency serves both purposes. I tend to think of these things
on the large scale, which is the reason I pointed things that way.

                                        --jeff





Thread