1994-07-23 - Re: Voice/Fax Checks

Header Data

From: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aa25093af225fbdd8574c9f96e4c2e60f94f2074a7c0659c1af7d9d3b4c4f857
Message ID: <940722.183524.4a8.rusnews.w165w@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org>
Reply To: <9407221709.AA15468@ua.MIT.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-23 03:47:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 20:47:07 PDT

Raw message

From: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 20:47:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Voice/Fax Checks
In-Reply-To: <9407221709.AA15468@ua.MIT.EDU>
Message-ID: <940722.183524.4a8.rusnews.w165w@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, solman@MIT.EDU writes:

> I don't agree on this point. I prefer license based e-cash which is modified
> on each transaction (and unfortunatelly gets slightly bigger -- the downside
> of this method).

I'm not clear on this point.  Is this an audit trail built into the
e-cash?  I'm not so sure that's a Good Thing.
- -- 
Roy M. Silvernail  []  roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org

                          It's just this little chromium switch.......

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAwUBLjBYHRvikii9febJAQHbzAP7BtK0oS6oO78/J9781IyA5mQQv7Jjl1SP
D/M8pLSHco4q6OhHHEa2qLUOzMeh2v1CArFvXjZjx2Yg3AmmWCR3E0prCO0ZgQmh
iPOttdfue4W788rwpBtHVkOBPUjf5ilB7aifWXYxTgzwbGotbjILtBnvUvcQPSzi
+UYOmErloEY=
=e8lz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread