1994-07-29 - NYET objections

Header Data

From: nzook@math.utexas.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: efff2c32fa30f63b56a451232d07a748812e052c77c926b7f28fa75b8b0a379f
Message ID: <9407290327.AA16173@owl.ma.utexas.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-29 03:31:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 20:31:10 PDT

Raw message

From: nzook@math.utexas.edu
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 20:31:10 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: NYET objections
Message-ID: <9407290327.AA16173@owl.ma.utexas.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Subject: NYET objections
 
There were two objections raised so far that could actually apply.
 
1) Kids will talk about what they want to talk about.
 
That's true, unavoidable, etc etc etc.  Also irrelevant.  I'm not talking
about censoring what leaves a home.  I'm talking about parents themselves
limiting what comes in.  I'm talking about a parent deciding that Jonny
doesn't need to know a.s.b even exists.  If a parent decides that some
newsgroup or some file system contains info they don't want coming in, they
kill it themselves, from their own home, for their own kids.  ONLY.
 
2) What about crossposts?
 
I intended to specifically mention crossposts.  A message that was
crossposted from/to a forbidden group is itself not displayed.
 





Thread