1994-08-09 - broadcast encryption

Header Data

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1d6d2ef318807af929b0588b558f104896b8c69b51c2311acb0c076acae9f8cc
Message ID: <9408091649.AA22593@ah.com>
Reply To: <9408091634.AA23392@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-09 17:17:56 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:17:56 PDT

Raw message

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:17:56 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: broadcast encryption
In-Reply-To: <9408091634.AA23392@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <9408091649.AA22593@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   > What is the policy purpose for signing packets?  It will affect the
   > design.

   Anyone even making such suggestions has not been following the IPSP
   standardization work...

I wasn't asking what _the_ purpose was, but rather what the purpose
the original author (coming out of the context of a radio discussion)
had in mind.  I know _lots_ of reasons for signing packets in some
way.

Eric

Thread

• Return to August 1994

• Return to “Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>”
• Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”

• Return to “snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)”

• 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 08:00:59 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
  • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 09:24:58 PDT) - broadcast encryption - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
    • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 09:34:26 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:17:56 PDT) - broadcast encryption - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
        • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:24:16 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1994-08-10 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 18:03:31 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>