1994-08-25 - Re: Using PGP on Insecure Machines

Header Data

From: Linn Stanton <lstanton@sten.lehman.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 22b21946aa43e3d8cd73e1dbe8607f821a45b5b47585bf50c83947a44e2526cd
Message ID: <9408251336.AA15671@sten.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9408242328.AA12758@fnord.lehman.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-25 13:34:38 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 06:34:38 PDT

Raw message

From: Linn Stanton <lstanton@sten.lehman.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 06:34:38 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Using PGP on Insecure Machines
In-Reply-To: <9408242328.AA12758@fnord.lehman.com>
Message-ID: <9408251336.AA15671@sten.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <9408242328.AA12758@fnord.lehman.com>Rick B. writes:
  > Trying to get strong crypto to be commonplace is hardly the most
  > fanatical thing that gets discussed on this list.

This is not a point to be minimized. Even when the security of each message
is not all that high, the more encrypted traffic there is, the better
off we all are.

'The nail that sticks up gets hammered down'




Thread