1994-08-02 - Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack

Header Data

From: “L. Todd Masco” <cactus@bb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 33c0cd030a36531977102b52d6f077690da09f03f9da91a5788b4e23a189e27d
Message ID: <199408022345.TAA25986@bb.com>
Reply To: <aa6460190d02102348e3@[198.232.141.2]>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-02 23:42:31 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 16:42:31 PDT

Raw message

From: "L. Todd Masco" <cactus@bb.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 16:42:31 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous code name allocated. // penet hack
In-Reply-To: <aa6460190d02102348e3@[198.232.141.2]>
Message-ID: <199408022345.TAA25986@bb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Doug Cutrell writes:
 > >So, in between my check and yours, Todd posted the cypherpunks hack
 > >telnet 25 and the anonymous id disappeared.  Hmmmmm.  I wonder how
 > >that happened?  :-)
 > >
 > >Thanks Todd!
 > >
 > >                        Rick
 > 
 > I'd like to understand what Todd's "hack" means... I assume that he's
 > talking about telnetting to the sendmail port.  But I thought that anyone
 > could unsubscribe anyone from cypherpunks by simply sending a message with:
 > 
 > unsubscribe cypherpunks obnoxious@jerk.com
 > 
 > It isn't even necessary to forge the return address, because majordomo
 > doesn't check.  I just pulled majordomo's help file.  It's appended below.

In my experience, listservers will clear any commands that don't come from
 the person affected by passing them on for processing by the list
 maintainer as a security precaution.  I had assumed majordomo
 did this, but I'm not certain.

	-- Todd





Thread