1994-08-01 - Re: Labeling Usenet articles.

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
Message Hash: 6744c43bd1b8a9bdf19aa1744dba010b95a50b07fe8d1d63226ecf37d73ba380
Message ID: <9408011846.AA08709@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199408011839.OAA08892@cs.oberlin.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-01 18:48:51 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 11:48:51 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 11:48:51 PDT
To: Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
Subject: Re: Labeling Usenet articles.
In-Reply-To: <199408011839.OAA08892@cs.oberlin.edu>
Message-ID: <9408011846.AA08709@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Anyone interested in using PGP with netnews, or with E-Mail in the
long run, should be looking at the new internet drafts on security
multipart extensions to MIME.

Perry


Jonathan Rochkind says:
> > No, I think he's essentially talking about a 'secure' moderated newsgroup.
> > That is, the moderator(s) would sign each 'authorised' message with a
> > special key, and the newsreader would verify that it was signed by a
>  
> Ah, now I understand, thanks. Actually, now that I see what you're getting
> at, this _does_ seem like a good idea. I think moderated newsgroups can
> be useful in some circumstances (sure, including a fundie newsgroup), and
> it would be nice to have a cryptographically secure system of doing this,
> that cant' be easily circumvented like the present one. 
>  
> And I agree that scripts using PGP do seem capable of doing this, rather then
> writing some new software. This actually is quite a good idea.





Thread