1994-08-30 - Re: e$ as “travellers check?

Header Data

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: John Douceur <johndo@microsoft.com>
Message Hash: 8b770421de78fd2b595cc60c6c73f3bb3b1596dfa733f2752902ea3a5bc4bc64
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9408292156.A25133-0100000@zeus>
Reply To: <9408292346.AA13380@netmail2.microsoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-30 01:41:37 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:41:37 PDT

Raw message

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:41:37 PDT
To: John Douceur <johndo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: e$ as "travellers check?
In-Reply-To: <9408292346.AA13380@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9408292156.A25133-0100000@zeus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> >> Digitally signed notes are not forgeable.
> 
> >   I doubt very seriously that there is anything on the planet that is
> >*ABSOLUTELY* unforgable.   It all comes down to how much energy and
> >resources one is willing to sink into the project.
> 
> This comment, unless I misunderstand it, supports (rather than refutes)
> Perry's rebuttal to the claim that forging digital traveller's checks
> would be "extremely easy."

   No - it just makes the point that there is almost nothing which is 
"not forgeable" with a suitable expenditure of effort & resources.

-jon
( THEY CAN STOP THE PARTY, BUT THEY CAN'T STOP THE FUTURE )
( --------------------[ entropy@intnet.net ]------------- )





Thread