1994-08-23 - Re: Nuclear Weapons Material

Header Data

From: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
To: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk
Message Hash: 8ce5ec4dc902913219479e8cca9e1d18fd38dbb943510bca96d559d7e2898a71
Message ID: <m0qczBi-0009z1C@sdwsys>
Reply To: <7308@aiki.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-23 20:57:15 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Aug 94 13:57:15 PDT

Raw message

From: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 94 13:57:15 PDT
To: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Nuclear Weapons Material
In-Reply-To: <7308@aiki.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <m0qczBi-0009z1C@sdwsys>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> In message <paBMkOwscIgG070yn@io.org> Mark Terka writes:
> > Not to mention the fact that without tritium, the "trigger" for nuclear
> > weapons (and extremely expensive and rare at $ 100m a gram) all you have
> > is a radioactive paperweight.
> 
> To the best of my knowledge, tritium is not used in nuclear weapons
> (meaning A-bombs), only in thermonuclear weapons (H-bombs).  One of
> my teachers was involved in the Manhattan project; he never mentioned
> any need for tritium.
> --
> Jim Dixon

I agree.  Fission bombs I thought just needed shaped metal with a
conventional charge to force compression and make it go critical.

Fusion bombs I thought used tritium as fuel and needed a Plutonium
trigger or something.  They are supposedly set off with some kind of
inner mirrored ball with high powered lasers.  Fission then fusion I
believe.


sdw
-- 
Stephen D. Williams  Local Internet Gateway Co.; SDW Systems 513 496-5223APager
LIG dev./sales       Internet: sdw@lig.net
OO R&D Source Dist.  By Horse: 2464 Rosina Dr., Miamisburg, OH 45342-6430
Comm. Consulting     ICBM: 39 34N 85 15W I love it when a plan comes together
Newbie Notice:                          (Surfer's know the score...)
     I speak for LIGCo., CCI, myself, and no one else, regardless of
     where it is convenient to post from or thru.




Thread