1994-08-13 - Re: Bug in PgP2.6???

Header Data

From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95c794656d6d1c9ae3598abfffe879ef5b0785c8dc9fa053675d1d2f2f1e260d
Message ID: <940813120832v2vjgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-13 17:11:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Aug 94 10:11:35 PDT

Raw message

From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 94 10:11:35 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Bug in PgP2.6???
Message-ID: <940813120832v2vjgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Ben.Goren@asu.edu writes:

> The EFF has sold us out, and this is making MIT look rather unprofessional.
     Wild conspiracy theories aside for the moment, I back MIT on this
one. People are only beginning to get clued in as to what version the
current version is. Releasing a new version at this point, IMHO, would be
a MAJOR headache. If you've ever worked for a software company, and tried
to deal with the maintenance-version-of-the-day, you'll understand where
I'm coming from.

     OTOH, guys [Hey you! MIT!], if it's an easy bug to fix, at least post
a SOURCE PATCH.

                                        --Jeff
--
======  ======    +----------------jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us----------------+
  ==    ==        | The new, improved, environmentally safe, bigger, better,|
  ==    ==  -=    | faster, hypo-allergenic, AND politically correct .sig.  |
====    ======    | Now with a new fresh lemon scent!                       |
PGP Key Available +---------------------------------------------------------+ 





Thread