1994-08-01 - Re: Labeling Usenet articles.

Header Data

From: Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
To: mark@unicorn.com
Message Hash: f712df6efc9c4490e44ad86f952122eb8c32cee36b8e76fd3827c7212ad2e989
Message ID: <199408011839.OAA08892@cs.oberlin.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-01 18:39:59 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 11:39:59 PDT

Raw message

From: Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 11:39:59 PDT
To: mark@unicorn.com
Subject: Re: Labeling Usenet articles.
Message-ID: <199408011839.OAA08892@cs.oberlin.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> No, I think he's essentially talking about a 'secure' moderated newsgroup.
> That is, the moderator(s) would sign each 'authorised' message with a
> special key, and the newsreader would verify that it was signed by a
 
Ah, now I understand, thanks. Actually, now that I see what you're getting
at, this _does_ seem like a good idea. I think moderated newsgroups can
be useful in some circumstances (sure, including a fundie newsgroup), and
it would be nice to have a cryptographically secure system of doing this,
that cant' be easily circumvented like the present one. 
 
And I agree that scripts using PGP do seem capable of doing this, rather then
writing some new software. This actually is quite a good idea.





Thread