1994-09-16 - Re: if this is RC4

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
Message Hash: 37b25b85da409955d95b03ce7c7885893a689e3f59f98301100bbed3e7592834
Message ID: <9409161457.AA06229@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199409161454.HAA25139@netcom10.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-16 14:57:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Sep 94 07:57:20 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 94 07:57:20 PDT
To: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
Subject: Re: if this is RC4
In-Reply-To: <199409161454.HAA25139@netcom10.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9409161457.AA06229@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



James A. Donald says:
> Perry E. Metzger writes
> > One possibility is that the author may have simply decompiled the
> > original code...
> 
> Decompilation would not preserve the original style.

Of course it would. If a symbol table was present, you'd even end up
with the same variable names.

> Is "decompilation" actually the word you had in mind?

Yes.

.pm





Thread