1994-09-29 - Re: Fortress Remailers

Header Data

From: macorp!moonlight!ken@uu4.psi.com (Ken Landaiche)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5305dfae73ff1357c2cf82e65c0b6da6e4152272b1bafaa165d4c8405e68acba
Message ID: <9409291909.AA03784@moonlight.noname>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-29 19:53:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Sep 94 12:53:25 PDT

Raw message

From: macorp!moonlight!ken@uu4.psi.com (Ken Landaiche)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 94 12:53:25 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fortress Remailers
Message-ID: <9409291909.AA03784@moonlight.noname>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Could one set up a virtual remailer that floated around a set of news 
groups? The active remailer would pass an encrypted token to a randomly
chosen member of the set which would become the remailer for the next
interval. A compromized member of the set might then eat the token,
rendering th remailer inoperative, but maybe that could be overcome.
Although I don't have much more than a layman's grasp of cryptography
my basic thought is to consider the set of potential mailers the way
one would consider some known element in a cryptographic scheme, such
as a randomly accessed lookup table, so that if a cracker couldn't
determine the next element in the table, she couldn't determine where
the remailer would be next, either.





Thread