1994-09-26 - Re: National Research Council

Header Data

From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
To: Ozzie/O=Iris@IRIS)
Message Hash: 998e6b1f4bf014a31162880a558bdfd82cb5c69b3359cb06f6e1b7706f71ca2b
Message ID: <199409262322.AA08337@access3.digex.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-26 23:25:00 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 26 Sep 94 16:25:00 PDT

Raw message

From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 94 16:25:00 PDT
To: Ozzie/O=Iris@IRIS)
Subject: Re: National Research Council
Message-ID: <199409262322.AA08337@access3.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>You shouldn't immediately dismiss the establishment as being unsympathetic; 
>many of us are working toward common goals, but in different ways.  In my 
>case, since '84, through mass commercial distribution of strong crypto.
>
>While you can obviously trust no one to represent your interests with 100% 
>accuracy, I've been here for a while and will most definitely be trying to 
>represent CP viewpoints through my perception of those expressed in this 
>forum.
>
>Ray

This is certainly true. For instance, I've spoken with one ex-Air Force
Intelligence Officer who feels that Clipper is a bad idea because it
gives the enemy a single target to attack. Grab clipper and you've got
the key to everything. He may care about "rights" but he talks about
security. 








Thread