1994-10-05 - Re: Impact of Free Strong Crypto (Essay of sorts)

Header Data

From: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
To: unicorn@access.digex.net
Message Hash: 2b741bd6da8d01ce7a4626851a116660211c8b6af4cf4915e30e01dd6d887076
Message ID: <9410051318.AA08719@tis.com>
Reply To: <199410042147.OAA00604@comsec.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-05 13:19:09 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Oct 94 06:19:09 PDT

Raw message

From: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 94 06:19:09 PDT
To: unicorn@access.digex.net
Subject: Re: Impact of Free Strong Crypto (Essay of sorts)
In-Reply-To: <199410042147.OAA00604@comsec.com>
Message-ID: <9410051318.AA08719@tis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
>Date: Sun, 2 Oct 1994 22:30:22 -0400 (EDT)


>How will the complete inability of law enforcement (Federal or Local) to 
>conduct wiretaps impact collection?  Those who think that law enforcement 
>will just have to go away might want to reconsider.  Instead I think that 
>law enforcement will simply become much more intrusive as a response to the 
>unavailability of easy interception via wiretapping.


The more I try to disseminate PGP and RIPEM (and get people to use them),
the more I think that inability to conduct wiretaps and get intelligence
from them will never occur.  If it were to occur, we'd probably see laws
passed immediately against civilian cryptography.  If we merely threaten
it, we give a weapon to the FBI to request such laws and a compliant
Congress might actually go ahead and give in.  However, the prediction I
find I have to make is that ccivilian





Thread