1994-11-18 - Re: Remailer Blocking and Negative Reputations
Header Data
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 1f854d39f003d976f6ac6dbff33c66b389237c64a63827c281b809cba0e0c3bb
Message ID: <199411180103.RAA06662@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <199411180041.QAA14839@netcom18.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-18 01:06:03 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Nov 94 17:06:03 PST
Raw message
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 94 17:06:03 PST
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Remailer Blocking and Negative Reputations
In-Reply-To: <199411180041.QAA14839@netcom18.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199411180103.RAA06662@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
It seems the case, however, that most people who abuse the
remailers have No Clue, and wouldn't even think to do that, or even
have the resources to do that..
The case with jpunix for example was pretty simple as Perry
was able to figure out who to block simply because the 'abuse'r (I put
'abuse' in quotes because everyone's definition of abuse differs)
didn't chain.. I.e. the 'abuser' had No Clue.
I don't think this is much of a problem.
--
sameer Voice: 510-841-2014
Network Administrator Pager: 510-321-1014
Community ConneXion: The NEXUS-Berkeley Dialin: 510-549-1383
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org
Thread
Return to November 1994
- Return to ““John A. Perry” <perry@jpunix.com>”
- Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
- 1994-11-18 (Thu, 17 Nov 94 16:41:53 PST) - Remailer Blocking and Negative Reputations - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1994-11-18 (Thu, 17 Nov 94 17:06:03 PST) - Re: Remailer Blocking and Negative Reputations - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
- 1994-11-18 (Thu, 17 Nov 94 17:23:13 PST) - Re: Remailer Blocking and Negative Reputations - “John A. Perry” <perry@jpunix.com>