1994-12-01 - Re: Effects of Marking/Delaying Nonsigned Posts

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 15d64415b7ed7f495490796ec66ea8545ebde1bdeb3f04f90992d09e9aa5b8bf
Message ID: <199412012058.MAA13655@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <199412011128.DAA27458@netcom3.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-01 20:00:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Dec 94 12:00:00 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 94 12:00:00 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Effects of Marking/Delaying Nonsigned Posts
In-Reply-To: <199412011128.DAA27458@netcom3.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199412012058.MAA13655@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

   Eric Hughes wrote:

   > This afternoon I considered starting the initial delay at one minute
   > and incrementing the delay by one minute each time a message gets
   > delayed.  

The counter would be global to the server, not local to each user.

   A concrete basis for comment.

You'll likely want to comment again, though.

Eric





Thread