1994-12-14 - re: mime

Header Data

From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 76119d2b3a6a14d9d266e86fc37ef85adb16fb976a530a21b6baaeb03ade6ed2
Message ID: <199412142332.PAA26126@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-14 23:33:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Dec 94 15:33:06 PST

Raw message

From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 94 15:33:06 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: mime
Message-ID: <199412142332.PAA26126@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Probably because that is the direction mail is going.  If you can't
> do it too bad, but don't expect everyone else to wait around for you
> to catch up. Time to move your mail into the early 90s and get a
> MIME-aware mail agent...

Ah, a refreshing sentiment ;)

There is an EXCELLENT article in this month's Scientific American
which touches upon this issue.  "Ensuring the Longevity of Digital
Documents".  

It mentions how a Shakespeare sonnet written four centuries ago is
still readable.  Data stored/formatted in completly cutting edge ways
from a decade or two ago is in danger of becoming unreadable.  (8"
floppy disks, paper tape, CDC 876 mag tapes anybody?)






Thread