From: Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 94 12:28:57 PST
To: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Subject: Re: List of reliable remailers
In-Reply-To: <ab1b9804040210048e31@[132.162.201.201]>
Message-ID: <199412192028.MAA05164@kiwi.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jonathan Rochkind writes:
 > At 9:50 AM 12/19/94, Raph Levien wrote:
 > >   eric
 > >          A variant of the cpunk style. Uses Anon-Send-To: instead.
 > 
 > Question:
 > Are there in fact any remailers out there that _don't_ take
 > Request-Remailing-To:, but only Anon-Send-To:? That is, are there in fact
 > any "eric" remailers, according to Raph's criteria?
 > 
 > I've used at least one of the remailers that's labled as "eric" on Raph's
 > list, and used "Request-Remailing-To:" with it, and been succesful.  I'm
 > wondering if this is the case for all of them.

I classified c2 as an "eric" remailer because it has normal handling
of subject lines with Anon-Send-To but not with Request-Remailing-To.
I think it kept the subject line even when the message was encrypted.
This is a big hole for traffic analysis.

Raph