1994-12-01 - Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta

Header Data

From: jamiel@sybase.com (Jamie Lawrence)
To: perobich@ingr.com
Message Hash: 9717b2d6f178746279b54a185ff6ba2b75c41b23655e48de7ea27a8ccaf96372
Message ID: <ab03f33308021004800c@[130.214.233.6]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-01 22:39:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Dec 94 14:39:51 PST

Raw message

From: jamiel@sybase.com (Jamie Lawrence)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 94 14:39:51 PST
To: perobich@ingr.com
Subject: Re: Brands excluded from digicash beta
Message-ID: <ab03f33308021004800c@[130.214.233.6]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Paul Robichaux (perobich@ingr.com) writes:

>Take a look at the process involved in clearing checks and you will soon
>see how it can get very strange.

If clearing sounds simple, may I suggest as a general rule of thumb
to look at the complexities involved with transaction management in
distributed database environment, and multiply the complexity found
there by the number of banks worldwide. Then, find a way to factor in
a many-to-many instead of a one-to-few achitecture.

And that rule of thumb completely ignores the fact that if a
transaction is fouled up anywhere along the line, one finds extensive
legal liability involved instead of a 'mere' corrupt table in a database.

-j

>jim






Thread