1994-12-08 - Re: NYT on Insecure Phones

Header Data

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: “L. Todd Masco” <cactus@hks.net>
Message Hash: a51b0a688a4cf87954f815d9c1b524fe065940ef7f3fd10236a4d95877eccbdc
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.941208003738.4295E-100000@xcalibur>
Reply To: <199412040432.XAA13619@bb.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-08 05:46:57 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Dec 94 21:46:57 PST

Raw message

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 94 21:46:57 PST
To: "L. Todd Masco" <cactus@hks.net>
Subject: Re: NYT on Insecure Phones
In-Reply-To: <199412040432.XAA13619@bb.hks.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.941208003738.4295E-100000@xcalibur>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> It's worse than that!  They will allow customers to use their service
> in NYC, I'm told by a customer of their's visiting this weekend, if
> they pay for the call with a credit card (IE, VISA, MC, etc) that they
> must *give* *an* *operator* *over* *the* *cellphone*.

   Cell1 is just not incredibly smart about security, physical or 
otherwise.  An aquaintance of mine found a "Fraud Alert Bulletin" in a 
Cellular One trash can which warned about the dangers of not shredding 
your trash.  Of course, in the same bag was wads of credit card info, NAM 
& ESN info, etc.

=jon

( --------[ Jonathan D. Cooper ]--------[ entropy@intnet.net ]-------- )
( PGP 2.6.2 keyprint: 31 50 8F 82 B9 79 ED C4  5B 12 A0 35 E0 9B C0 01 )





Thread