1994-12-01 - Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?

Header Data

From: cactus@bb.hks.net (L. Todd Masco)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d6f53a2dc782ea40807207f756833923a5d60b11e88ce8fa2f4f06968b37cc22
Message ID: <3bj4pv$r62@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: <199412010019.QAA11912@largo.remailer.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-01 00:14:30 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 16:14:30 PST

Raw message

From: cactus@bb.hks.net (L. Todd Masco)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 16:14:30 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?
In-Reply-To: <199412010019.QAA11912@largo.remailer.net>
Message-ID: <3bj4pv$r62@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <199412010019.QAA11912@largo.remailer.net>,
Eric Hughes <eric@remailer.net> wrote:
>   From: "L. Todd Masco" <cactus@hks.net>
>
>   Does the idea of having the list software check signatures strike
>   anybody else as a Bad Idea?  
>
>You mean, like the proposer (me)?

Sorry, I wasn't implying that you liked the idea: there are others on the list
who've been advocating this.
-- 
Todd Masco     | "Roam home to a dome, Where Georgian and Gothic once stood
cactus@hks.net |  Now chemical bonds alone guard our blond(e)s,
cactus@bb.com  |  And even the plumbing looks good."  - B Fuller





Thread