1995-01-04 - Re: Why I have a 512 bit PGP key

Header Data

From: Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 114ced1da94f285540d537dae725c2696123767641915e2c87685404e4889cdf
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950104140321.7300D-100000@eram.esi.com.au>
Reply To: <9501031809.AA21532@elysion.iaks.ira.uka.de>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-04 03:02:58 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Jan 95 19:02:58 PST

Raw message

From: Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 95 19:02:58 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why I have a 512 bit PGP key
In-Reply-To: <9501031809.AA21532@elysion.iaks.ira.uka.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950104140321.7300D-100000@eram.esi.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 3 Jan 1995, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[ On smart compilers ]

> It's enough to recognize DES tables or PGP procedures.

And common benchmarks, such as Eratosthenes' Sieve...

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) | dave@esi.com.au | VK2KFU @ VK2AAB.NSW.AUS.OC | PGP 2.6
Opinions expressed are mine. | E7 FE 97 88 E5 02 3C AE  9C 8C 54 5B 9A D4 A0 CD






Thread