1995-01-16 - Re: Crypto functions

Header Data

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: Ian Farquhar <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>
Message Hash: 1546fb9cc976436b53579327cb35c4aac9f97d4e0976d8f55948967987dffc15
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950115235145.23581A-100000@xcalibur>
Reply To: <9501161145.ZM27648@wiley.sydney.sgi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-16 05:04:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 Jan 95 21:04:09 PST

Raw message

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 95 21:04:09 PST
To: Ian Farquhar <ianf@sydney.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Crypto functions
In-Reply-To: <9501161145.ZM27648@wiley.sydney.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950115235145.23581A-100000@xcalibur>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Well, I wasn't the original person who said that they wouldn't use it,
> but I would agree.  It's too new.  It looks very good so far, but until it's
> been through a lot more analysis than Blowfish has received so far, it is
> too much of an unknown quantity.

   Ah.  Incidentally, I wasn't just being a wiseass when I asked why, I 
wanted to know.  

   Has no one significantly cryptanalysed Blowfish yet?

-jon

( --------[ Jonathan D. Cooper ]--------[ entropy@intnet.net ]-------- )
( PGP 2.6.2 keyprint: 31 50 8F 82 B9 79 ED C4  5B 12 A0 35 E0 9B C0 01 )
( home page: http://taz.hyperreal.com/~entropy/ ]---[ Key-ID: 4082CCB5 )





Thread