1995-01-05 - Re: Remailer Abuse

Header Data

From: db@Tadpole.COM (Doug Barnes)
To: entropy@IntNet.net (Jonathan Cooper)
Message Hash: 253edea47c8cd35166a26007f43a72cf09a55e5b1064af57ec59a51dbd1c564d
Message ID: <9501050458.AA10237@tadpole.tadpole.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950104192839.17118I-100000@xcalibur>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-05 04:58:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 20:58:12 PST

Raw message

From: db@Tadpole.COM (Doug Barnes)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 20:58:12 PST
To: entropy@IntNet.net (Jonathan Cooper)
Subject: Re: Remailer Abuse
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950104192839.17118I-100000@xcalibur>
Message-ID: <9501050458.AA10237@tadpole.tadpole.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>     See the remailer at c2.org as an example - quite nice, and has a 
> pay-for-more than n bandwidth agreement.  Works fine for a few small 
> chatty messages, won't work worth a damn for spamming.
> 

I like both this idea and this particular service. I didn't mean to
imply that nobody was charging/reducing spam.





Thread